Work environment and productivity in companies: a bibliometric analysis of scientific production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i3.2982Keywords:
Worker health, proactivity, administration, literature reviewAbstract
The physical context and interpersonal interactions within companies are of great importance for the proper functioning of the business ecosystem. Successful companies understand that the workplace directly influences productivity, as it directly affects those responsible for the functioning of operations, the employees. Understanding how this physical context influences productivity is of great importance, requiring studies on this topic to be carried out, as there are not many studies in this line. Therefore, the objective of this work was to carry out a bibliometric analysis of scientific production on the interaction between the work environment and productivity. For this, a bibliometric analysis was carried out with data from Web of Science – WOS, searching for articles that talk about this topic between the years 2013 and 2022, extracting information related to the annual evolution of publications, the main countries, institutions and researchers of the area and main articles. The survey reveals a significant increase in interest in this topic in recent years, with the United States leading the contributions. The predominant areas are Business Economics, Engineering and Public Environmental Occupational Health, indicating the interdisciplinary complexity of the subject and suggesting directions for future research.
Metrics
References
Buckley, J. P., Hedge, A., Yates, T., Copeland, R. J., Loosemore, M., Hamer, M., Bradley, G., & Dunstan, D. W. (2015). The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(21), 1357–1362. https://doi.org/10.1136/BJSPORTS-2015-094618
Chiavenato, I. (2005). Comportamento Organizacional: A dinâmica do sucesso das organizações. Barueri, Editora Manole.
Chiavenato, I. (2010). Gestão de Pessoas: o novo papel dos recursos humanos nas organizações. 3a ed. Rio de Janeiro, Elsevier.
Clements-Croome, D. (2015). Creative and productive workplaces: A review. Intelligent Buildings International, 7, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2015.1019698
Dejours, C. (1998). The Madness of Work: Labour Psychopathology Study. São Paulo, Cortez.
Farias, N. S., & Pinto, F. S. (2023). Análise bibliométrica da produção científica sobre a gamificação no ensino de História. Diversitas Journal, 8(4), 2753–2763. https://doi.org/10.48017/DJ.V8I4.2753
Kamalakannan, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2020). Occupational therapy: The key to unlocking locked-up occupations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 153. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16089.1
Kersemaekers, W., Rupprecht, S., Wittmann, M., Tamdjidi, C., Falke, P., Donders, R., Speckens, A., & Kohls, N. (2018). A workplace mindfulness intervention may be associated with improved psychological well-being and productivity. A preliminary field study in a company setting. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(FEB), 265830. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2018.00195/BIBTEX
Kurogi, K., Ikegami, K., Eguchi, H., Tsuji, M., Tateishi, S., Nagata, T., Matsuda, S., Fujino, Y., Ogami, A., Harada, A., Hino, A., Ando, H., Tokutsu, K., Muramatsu, K., Mori, K., Mafune, K., Kitagawa, K., Nagata, M., Liu, N., … Ishimaru, T. (2021). A cross-sectional study on perceived workplace health support and health-related quality of life. Journal of Occupational Health, 63(1), e12302. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12302
Martins, G. A. (2008) Estudo de caso: uma estratégia de pesquisa. 2 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Massi, M. L. G., & Camargo, L. A. A. (2021). A qualidade de vida no trabalho e sua relação com a produtividade e lucratividade de uma empresa de serviço de pequeno porte. REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISA, 10(2), Artigo 2. https://doi.org/10.22567/rep.v10i2.772
Moraes, R. de O., Igarashi, E. T., Camacho, R. R., & Marques, K. C. M. (2013). Gestão Estratégica de Custos: Investigação da Produção Científica no Período de 2008 a 2012. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Custos - ABC. https://anaiscbc.emnuvens.com.br/anais/article/view/131
Oliveira, S. C. M., Barbosa, E. de S., Rezende, I. C. C., Silva, R. P. A., & Albuquerque, L. S. (2013). Bibliometria em artigos de contabilidade aplicada ao setor público. Anais Do Congresso Brasileiro de Custos - ABC. https://anaiscbc.emnuvens.com.br/anais/article/view/125
Rodrigues, E. A., Rampasso, I. S., Serafim, M. P., Filho, W. L., & Anholon, R. (2022). Productivity analysis in work from home modality: An exploratory study considering an emerging country scenario in the COVID-19 context. Work (Reading, Mass.), 72(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211212
Rodriguez-Aceves, L. A., Madero, S., & Valerio-Ureña, G. (2018). Perceptions about the usefulness of online social networks in the workplace. Estudios Gerenciales, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2018.147.2580
Rothe, P. M., Beijer, M., & Van der Voordt, T. J. (2011). Most important aspects of the work environment. In Proceedings of the 10th EuroFM research symposium, 1-12.
Seligmann-Silva, E., Bernardo, M. H., Maeno, M., & Kato, M. (2010). O mundo contemporâneo do trabalho e a saúde mental do trabalhador. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 35, 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572010000200002
Silva, M., Hayashi, C., & Hayashi, M. C. (2011). Análise bibliométrica e cientométrica: Desafios para especialistas que atuam no campo. InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação, 2, 110–129. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2178-2075.v2i1p110-129
Sobhani, A., Wahab, M. I. M., & Jaber, M. Y. (2019). The effect of working environment aspects on a vendor–buyer inventory model. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2018.11.017
Tavares, F., Santos, E., Diogo, A., & Ratten, V. (2020). Teleworking in Portuguese communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 15(3), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-06-2020-0113/FULL/PDF
Waber, B., Magnolfi, J., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Workspaces That Move People. Harvard business review, 92, 68–77, 121.
Wirtz, J., Pereira, E., Hemzo, M. A., & Lovelock, C. (2020). Marketing de Serviços: Pessoas, Tecnologia e Estratégia: Pessoas, Tecnologia e Estratégia. 8 ed. São Paulo, Saraiva Educação S.A.
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tiago de Almeida Leite, Luiz Geraldo Rodrigues de Gusmão
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Diversitas Journal expresses that the articles are the sole responsibility of the Authors, who are familiar with Brazilian and international legislation.
Articles are peer-reviewed and care should be taken to warn of the possible incidence of plagiarism. However, plagiarism is an indisputable action by the authors.
The violation of copyright is a crime, provided for in article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code: “Art. 184 Violating copyright and related rights: Penalty - detention, from 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or fine. § 1 If the violation consists of total or partial reproduction, for the purpose of direct or indirect profit, by any means or process, of intellectual work, interpretation, performance or phonogram, without the express authorization of the author, the performer, the producer , as the case may be, or whoever represents them: Penalty - imprisonment, from 2 (two) to 4 (four) years, and a fine. ”
.png){kind=logo}
