Effective strategies for teaching philological disciplines: practicalc ases and Innovative approaches

Autores/as

  • Inna Varvaruk Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-8813
  • Inna Sakhnevych Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ucrania https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7783-495X
  • Nataliia Hasiuk Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Muzika Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • Oleksandr Lada Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i3.3052

Palabras clave:

Philological disciplines, Teaching strategies, Innovative approaches, Education practices, Student engagement

Resumen

This article delves into the expediency of exploring effective strategies for teaching philological disciplines, emphasizing the critical importance of innovative approaches in modern educational practices. As the field of philology continues to evolve, the relevance of enhancing teaching methodologies to meet the diverse learning needs of students becomes increasingly evident. The primary objective of this study is to investigate practical cases and innovative approaches that can significantly impact the pedagogical landscape of philological education. Utilizing a qualitative research approach, the article examines the efficacy of implementing various teaching strategies in philological disciplines and their implications for student engagement and academic performance. Through case studies and theoretical analysis, the research reveals the effectiveness of interactive teaching methods, collaborative learning activities, and technology integration in philological education. The results highlight the potential for these innovative approaches to enhance student comprehension, critical thinking skills, and overall academic achievement, ultimately contributing to the advancement of teaching practices in philological disciplines. The practical and theoretical significance of these findings lies in the increased efficiency and effectiveness of teaching methods, leading to improved learning outcomes and student success in the field of philology.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Inna Varvaruk, Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

0000-0002-3407-8813; Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. inna_varvaruk@ proton.me

Inna Sakhnevych, Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ucrania

0000-0001-7783-495X; Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. inna.sakhnevych@ukd.edu.ua

Nataliia Hasiuk, Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

0009-0003-0546-662X; Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. nataliia.hasiuk@ukd.edu.ua

Tetiana Muzika, Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

0009-0002-2653-6108; Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. tetiana.muzyka@ukd.edu.ua

Oleksandr Lada, Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

0000-0002-8253-0114; Higher Educational Institution “King Danylo University”, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. oleksandr.lada@ukd.edu.ua



Citas

Adger, C. T., Snow, C. E., & Christian, D. (Eds.). (2018). What teachers need to know about language (Vol. 2). Multilingual Matters , 176.

Adnan, A. H. M. (2020, September). From interactive teaching to immersive learning: Higher Education 4.0 via 360-degree videos and virtual reality in Malaysia. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 917, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702.

Anderson, R.D. (2020). German (Humboldtian) University Tradition, The. In: Teixeira, P.N., Shin, J.C. (eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_4

Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-48.

Aydin, H. (2013). A literature-based approaches on multicultural education. The Anthropologist, 16(1-2), 31-44.

Aytaç, T., & Kula, S. S. (2020). The Effect of Student-Centered Approaches on Students' Creative Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(2), 62-80.

Barus, I. R. G., & Simanjuntak, M. B. (2020). Evieta-Based Learning Material in English Business Class: Students’ Perceptions. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 73-82.

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2004). Language assessment. Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education, 20.

Carter, P., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Teaching diverse learners. Handbook of research on teaching, 5, 593-638.

Cheng, C. M. (2012). The Influence of College EFL Teachers' Understandings of Intercultural Competence on Their Self-Reported Pedagogical Practices in Taiwan. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(1), 164-182.

Collier, V. P. (2014). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. In The New Immigrant and Language (pp. 49-71). Routledge.

Daryanti, F., Jazuli, M., Sumaryanto, T., & Hatono, H. (2020). Students' Creative Thinking Skills. In The Preservation Of Traditional. International Journal of scientific and technology research, 9(4), 589-591.

De Back, T. T., Tinga, A. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2023). Learning in immersed collaborative virtual environments: design and implementation. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(8), 5364-5382.

Dudar, V. L., Riznyk, V. V., Kotsur, V. V., Pechenizka, S. S., & Kovtun, O. A. (2021). Use of modern technologies and digital tools in the context of distance and mixed learning. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 733-750.

Hrynevych, L., Morze, N., Vember, V., & Boiko, M. (2021). Use of digital tools as a component of STEM education ecosystem. Educational Technology Quarterly, (1), 1-22.

Huo, X. (2020). Higher education internationalization and English language instruction: Intersectionality of race and language in Canadian universities. Springer Nature.

Javed, F. (2023). Transformative Learning Strategies for Successful Teaching and Learning in the Transforming Higher Education. In Active and Transformative Learning in STEAM Disciplines (pp. 125-152). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Kazachiner, O. (2020). Developing Philology Teachers’ Inclusive Competence in Postgraduate Education. Educational Challenges, 25(1).

Kozak, A., Lavrynovych, L., Sukhareva, S., Iaruchyk, V., & Iaruchyk, O. (2020). Modern digital technologies in teaching philological disciplines. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 13(32), 1-22.

Lee, J. S., & Anderson, K. T. (2009). Negotiating linguistic and cultural identities: Theorizing and constructing opportunities and risks in education. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 181-211.

Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)

Meirbekov, A., Maslova, I., & Gallyamova, Z. (2022). Digital education tools for critical thinking development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101023.

Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning–mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41-57.

Rummler, K., Honegger, B. D., Moser, H., & Niesyto, H. (2016). Medienbildung und informatische Bildung – quo vadis?. Themenheft 25, MedienPädagogik – Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung. Zürich: OAPublishing Collective. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/25.X.

Shevchenko, M. S., Baiko, V. A., & Nekrasova, M. Y. (2021). Integration of active and interactive teaching methods of students’ language personality development. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.06.03.116

Srivastava, G., & Bag, S. (2023). Tools and Techniques of Digital Education. Encyclopedia of Data Science and Machine Learning, 1578-1598.

Strand, C., Vähämäki, J., Söderbaum, F., Bjarnegård, E., & Ewald, J. (2020). Development Research in Sweden–a dispersed research community under pressure. EBA Working Paper, April 2020.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2023). Developing materials for language teaching (p. 584), 3rd edition. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Ürün, M. F. (2016). Integration of technology into language teaching: A comparative review study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 76.

Van den Branden, K. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164-181.

Yu, Z., Yu, L., Xu, Q., Xu, W., & Wu, P. (2022). Effects of mobile learning technologies and social media tools on student engagement and learning outcomes of English learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), 381-398.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-07-27

Cómo citar

Varvaruk, I., Sakhnevych, I., Hasiuk, N., Muzika, T., & Lada, O. (2024). Effective strategies for teaching philological disciplines: practicalc ases and Innovative approaches. Diversitas Journal, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i3.3052